In what is --building-->shaping up to be one of the year's most --highly anticipated weeks-->intense debates on Capitol Hill, Senate Democrats are pushing climate change legislation that --stands to-->could upend the way --that-->the country regulates greenhouse gases. The Climate Security Act (also known as the Lieberman-Warner bill-- as it is being sponsored by Sens. Joseph Lieberman, I/D-Conn., John Warner, R-Va., and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.-->) calls for a 70 percent cut in --the country's-->emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050 and would set up a cap-and-trade system for businesses, which would now have to pay the government for polluting.
Few actually expect the bill to pass this year. But the debate which began on Monday could set the stage for the 111th Congress and a new president to take action early in 2009. --The legislation faces huge obstacles, however, as many Republicans and some Democrats, especially from heavy manufacturing and energy producing states, have expressed reservations as to what effect the bill will have on the American economy and families and workers in their states.-->And special interests are lining up on both sides of the aisle--, with environmentalists lobbying hard for the federal government to finally take action on the issue of climate change, while the oil and coal industries and many conservative groups are vehemently opposing the legislation-->.
The Club for Growth--, a conservative group with a "pro-growth" agenda that includes making the Bush tax cuts permanent, limiting government spending and getting Republicans elected to Congress,--> is spending $250,000 to run TV and radio ads opposing the bill in four key states. The ads target Sens. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., Jon Tester, D-Mont., and Max Baucus, D-Mont., whom a spokesperson said were chosen to represent a cross-section of legislators who have not denounced the bill.
A Montana version (subscription) of the TV spot presents the Climate Security Act as "another huge, costly government program" that the nation cannot afford. --"Congress is at it again," an announcer proclaims. "This time they're pushing massive new taxes and regulations in the name of global warming." Citing a 2008 report commissioned by the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Council for Capital Formation, the ad-->An announcer claims that the bill would cost Americans untold amounts of money in the form of job losses, tax increases and even higher energy costs.
A similar radio spot (subscription) running in North Carolina adds that "while Americans shoulder the economic burden, developing nations such as China and India would get a free pass." --This argument, that whatever good might come from an American effort to reverse climate change would just be undone by developing countries with lax regulation, is a central sticking point between the different camps Finally, the announcer encourages viewers to call their states' senators and "tell them to vote no" on Lieberman-Warner.-->
Club for Growth President Pat Toomey said in a press release announcing the ads: "While the benefits of the Lieberman-Warner bill are dubious at best, the costs to our economy will be massive."
The Environmental Defense Fund is fighting back against what they see as climate-change cynics, however, launching a $4 million campaign to build momentum for the legislation. "These ads are an effort to mobilize everyone who is sick of having our economy and environment hostage to imported oil," said Keith Gaby, communications director for the EDF's National Climate Campaign, in a press release.
"Grounded" (subscription) expresses the environmental lobby's fears that the well-entrenched oil and coal industries will "do anything to drive this bill into the ground." A man touts the potential benefits of the climate change legislation -- "investment in cleaner technology," creation of "manufacturing jobs" and an expansion of "renewable energy" -- as oil barrels fall from the sky, hitting him on the head and burying him deeper and deeper into the ground. "Don't let special interests win and America lose," an announcer pleads. "Pass the Climate Security Act now."
Another --clever-->humorous EDF ad, "Melting" (subscription), features a talking candle that melts while he sarcastically suggests that --the country should not rush to doing anything concrete about-->there's no need to be in a hurry to address global warming. "Sure, climate change is a problem; but let's not rush into anything," the wax man suggests, as his face starts to deform. "Hey, we could get companies to volunteer to cut their pollution. That's a prudent plan," he quips, at this point nothing more than a puddle of wax. An announcer adds: "The Climate Security Act will protect our kids' future and create jobs, but only if we move quickly."
--The Senate is http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/cda_20080603_3849.php" likely to debate the Climate Security Act throughout this week and, while a breakthrough is unlikely, supporters of the legislation will be looking to see which legislators might eventually be willing to compromise on the deal. This is likely to be just the first round in a long match to get Congress to come to a climate change consensus.-->